Jump to content

CnCNet Forums

Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Command & Conquer: Dawn of Tomorrow teaser thread


Kilkakon
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Syrianrefugeeengineer said:

Very nice job! It looks fantastic.

But one thing: Please, change your design, that you only need a facotry and barracs to build apcs :).

Can you implement stealth apcs as well?

And how many factions do you have? USA, but what else? Russia? China? Northcorea?

COntinue the great work!

There isn't a multiplayer, dude -.-

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Syrianrefugeeengineer said:

Then make one, "dude" ;).

This mod was started well before CnCNet was at the level it's at now.
And, Kilk has expressed before that he has, in no way, balanced this mod for multiplayer.

Instead of demanding stuff, why not go and check out what this mod is and is all about.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, chem said:

Very very impressive, well done!!!

 

Some very loose suggestions

 

Id like to see the artillery with longer range, and faster turning speed! ie behave like a real artillery and fire far!

Can you give the A10 a super chain gun?

Id like to see Tank shells kill troops too, it seems silly that a tank with a cannon cant kill a troop and that a troop with a machine gun can kill a tank or a building, maybe make tanks immune to mini gunners, and mini gunners die to 1-3 shots but make them super cheap to compensate like 25 credits? Also make the bazookas do more damage to tanks and troops to further balance

If a human is hit by a tank shell armor piecing or not he is dead, same with a bazooka lol I always thought that was a lame way to balance the game ie to make it very unrealistic

 

Thank you Chem :D

I like your suggestion of making the Artillery more powerful. It's woefully underused in the classic game. The other suggestions would infringe on the other factions too much, but I'll make the Artillery less clunky to use ^^

On Sunday, 21 January 2018 at 8:05 PM, AchromicWhite said:

The new humvee sounds insane... like I'm scared it'll legit be OP... even in campaign, haha.
Maybe being such a glass cannon it'll be alright. Would have to test it to be sure.

Yeah, it's got 300 HP, light armour and dual chainguns. Too strong? Who knows :P

13 hours ago, Inq said:

Progress looks great Kilkakon:cncsmirk:

 

Only artwork suggestion would be:

Perhaps add a little weather damage/rust to the flat panels on the powerplant rework.

Ah yes that one was for my Christmas map! It was a bit difficult to draw that one as I have very few colours in that range. Glad you like it though--I won't be using it in my mod just yet as I have no space for it but I will be releasing it for public use when I have redone the buildup animation (the one in the Christmas map was a bit rushed)

6 hours ago, Syrianrefugeeengineer said:

Very nice job! It looks fantastic.

But one thing: Please, change your design, that you only need a facotry and barracs to build apcs :).

Can you implement stealth apcs as well?

And how many factions do you have? USA, but what else? Russia? China? Northcorea?

COntinue the great work!

Hey welcome to the thread man! I hope you'll enjoy the game when it's released.

There's 5 main factions :) Forces of Tomorrow, Company of Answers, USA, Russia and Japan.

As White pointed out, this is a single player mod. If it's really popular then I'm happy to explore a multiplayer version, although I'd probably have to pick two factions and do some pretty heavy hacking away at things to make them far. One team doesn't even get a Weapons Factory haha.

In the mean time you can check this vid out if you wanna see some gameplay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIFisBPfMlE

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Syrianrefugeeengineer said:

How about "priests" like in AoE I for the Company of Answers? xD

Which would do what, exactly? C&C has no support for healing weapons, nor for capturing units. The only way to repair is through the repair pad, and the only way to capture units is by putting an engineer into a building the unit is docked to.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TD is indeed a problem in that regard.

But wait, has the hospital not once been modified? Or was that through RA?

What if one group has all infantry being classified as vehicles? How would that work?

Just posting idea's. I don't know if it works.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys! Time for another update--this time the Machine Shop!

posted image

As you can see my plan with it is to have it as a tall 1x1 building with concrete bib. There's a slight issue in that the only way to implement this is to make it a power-plant sized building (size 3) with a small footprint, which means that most people look like they are attacking the ground behind it rather than the shop itself, and selection box for it is unnaturally large.

What do you guys think? :) Looks good? Any suggestions or done well as is? Should I give up on the bib entirely?

Edited by Kilkakon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bib does look a bit odd.

What  was the reasoning behind the 1x1 choice? (not sure why such a small shop, would need two large smoke stacks!)

It looks good with the area you have to work with... although perhaps the bunker part should be shaded grey also. (or house colour)

Edited by Inq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was inspired by addons from Starcraft :), which are pretty small. I could have gone 2x1, but this is what I ended up landing on after moving blocks and objects around in 3D Studio. There was also the desire to have that L shape on the bib, but as you say it looked strange after the fact. I wanted something that looked Weapons-Factory-esque but not copy/pasted.

I'll post an updated screenshot tonight once I've done the hex editing to make the refresh work. Without the bib players can build it behind the factory to make it look like a megafactory haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it looks neat, but just a bit strange for C&C being so small.
Would be cool if we could actually do add-ons.
Sill, maybe having the 3 spaces of bib is fine... I mean, it's different, but it doesn't look graphically incorrect.

The icon looks really nice, too. Really good job on that, actually. Did you just snap a picture of the 3D model and paste it onto a stock cameo background? 

Edited by AchromicWhite
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey thanks White :)

If you guys think that I should try again or make it larger I'm happy to try. Could always make a little scrapyard arrangement around it and make it 1x2 with a bib.

The icon is a bit of a combination actually. I removed the refinery from its icon to create that countryside, then rerendered the model at the appropriate angle and did a bunch of touchups to get to what you have here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kilkakon said:

Hey thanks White :)

If you guys think that I should try again or make it larger I'm happy to try. Could always make a little scrapyard arrangement around it and make it 1x2 with a bib.

The icon is a bit of a combination actually. I removed the refinery from its icon to create that countryside, then rerendered the model at the appropriate angle and did a bunch of touchups to get to what you have here.

I think, it's up to you how you want to do it, I guess it's just a more outlying feature of a structure in that it's so small. I did actually plan to do a similar tech styled structure in C&C:CR but have never gotten around to it... it was going to replace the GAP generator. So, as I say, it looks fine, just different.
But as you say, you could also just remove the bib, and have a different feel for it again.

Well, the icon looks great regardless. Nice job.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah after having tried and implemented the 1x1 size, I feel that going wider just makes sense as the small one looks odd and too tiny. Power of experimentation! Might even be enough to centre the current building on a 2x2 bib with a few barrels around it (or even by itself)

I don't actually have internet at my new place yet, so my posts will slow down for the next few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm back online!

Here's a preview of what I've managed during my downtime. Can you spot all the changes?

posted image

  • Finalised Machine Shop, including damage frame (I like the 2x2 bib :D )
  • Finalised APC icon
  • Darkened Hum-vee windscreen so it fits with the Teal scheme better
  • I also buffed the Artillery, although you can't really see that with a screenshot :P

 

Edited by Kilkakon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 15/02/2018 at 11:50 AM, Kilkakon said:

 

  • Finalised APC icon

Might just be mild ocd... but should you not mirror the APC icon so its driving left to right like the rest of the vehicle icons? :P

Machine shop looks good on the bigger bib - I do still find it a bit odd being so small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Heh heh what can I say White? :D You're welcome~ Hit me up if you do make anything cool.

I've started to go through the maps again and try to fix up the issues brought up in testing. About 6 maps will need to have their triggers or layout rearranged to some degree.

Still feels good when my to do list went from over 2000 characters to under 2000 characters :cncsmirk:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been thinking a bit more about the faction balance and had an open question for you all.

Would it be a problem if Russia lost access to the Rocket APC? They already have SSM and Mammoth tanks to handle anti-air, and their infantry lineup is the worst in the game.

If I do remove the Russian Rocket APC, I can then think about implementing the following ideas:

  • Japan Move the APC functionality to the Tear Gas Tank, making a Teargas APC
  • Japan Add a Missile Crawler, a long range missile launcher that is effective against aircraft, vehicles and buildings, but not infantry
  • Remove Rocket APC from both Russia and Japan, making it a Tomorrow exclusive vehicle

Food for thought :) Let me know what you think

 

EDIT: http://kilkakon.com/c&c/russia.php#units and http://kilkakon.com/c&c/japan.php#units are the current arsenals :)

Edited by Kilkakon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well as there's been no reply, I thought I can share something that I was tinkering with Jungle. I love Tschokky's work with the theatre, but I was wondering if it would be possible to do some palette changes to make something more tropical.

posted image

... into...

posted image

This is a bit closer to what I was thinking. Note that this is a very rough colourisation job so this isn't really representative of what the final product would be should I end up doing more. I would of course only want to proceed with Tschokky''s blessing.

On balance, however, I feel that this is a bit too much work for this main release. This mod has already taken a decade of development off and on and it'd be nice to finish it this year. :) Maybe for a follow-up add on campaign?

Edited by Kilkakon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By Nyerguds
      With Kamuix writing a guide on inserting maps into the N64 version, I got busy looking into how it would be possible to more-or-less automatically generate height maps of C&C maps, so inserted maps actually look good in N64.
      It took me a couple of tries, but finally I managed to create a set of tools to convert maps to height maps. All of these are contained inside the CnC64 File Converter. (v1.0.3 or higher)
       
      The basics:
      C&C terrain is not three-dimensional, but gives an illusion of 3D with the images on the cliffs. However, this illusion falls flat (literally) in a real 3D environment. To remedy this problem, they added greyscale images to the missions in N64 that indicate the elevation of the terrain (brighter = higher). So if you want to import maps into an N64 ROM and have them actually look good, they are going to need a height map too.
      Elevation is not done per cell, but on the four corners of each cell. Because of this, the height map images have a size of 65x65, whereas C&C maps are only 64x64 cells. However, the converter takes care of that automatically, so we'll just focus on making a 64x64 height map.
      The basic steps to make an image using the CnC64 File Converter:
      Open a map file, and convert it to a basic terrain levels image. This image will contain only the cliffs of the map. Save the terrain levels image and edit it in an image editor, and fill areas surrounded by cliffs with the colour for that level. If multiple levels are needed, use the brighter colors in the image's palette. There are 4 elevation levels that can be used. Open the map in the File Converter again, and generate the height map, using the terrain levels image you created. Convert the final image to 65x65 height map, and save it as paletteless N64 IMG format. The detailed steps:
       
      1. Convert a map to a basic levels image:
      Open the map you want to make a height map for. The process works best if there's a .ini file with it that tells the program which theater the map is, and how big the actual used area on the map is. The ini file itself will not be accepted by the program, so open either the .bin file, or the already-converted .map for the N64.
      Open the "Convert" menu, go to "Height map generation", and select "To basic levels image (from map)". This option will only work if you have a map loaded.

      You will end up with an image which has a dark gray background, and only the cliffs on it, in a slightly brighter gray. Note that this is a paletted image with five colours; even if the image is later saved as high-colour, it will be matched back to these five colours to be interpreted as height levels.

      As you see, the image has some modifications compared to the original; the conversion takes the last terrain types encountered at the edges of the actually used portion of the map, and stretches them to the full frame. This is done so cliffs placed outside a map's border to control reinforcements would not influence the height map.
      Note that the image is not saved yet at this point, so press Ctrl+S and save it to disk.
       
      2. Create the height levels image:
      Now the real work. Open the saved image file in your favourite image editor, and connect the cliffs to form closed areas. To do this correctly, open the map itself in a map editor so you can see the directions of the cliffs, and see what kind of elevation each area should have. Here's my process in a few steps:

      It doesn't matter if the image is saved in high colours, but as noted before, the converter will match it back to the five colours in the original image's palette, so there's no use in making detailed slopes in this. Its only function is to separate the terrain into levels.
      For the record, the grey tints used for the five levels are:
      #000000 (R=0, G=0, B=0) : Pure black. Shouldn't be used, since water creates a slight depression into terrain, and you can't do that on the lowest level. #404040 (R=64, G=64, B=64) : Basic terrain. This will be the starting level on the image, and should be seen as lowest level you can use. #808080 (R=128, G=128, B=128) : Cliffs elevation #1 #C0C0C0 (R=192, G=192, B=192) : Cliffs elevation #2 #FFFFFF (R=255, G=255, B=255) : Cliffs elevation #3. Note that this is the highest possible level, and no more terrain details can be put on top of this. Rivers should work, though, since they decrease the terrain. Anyway, with that done, we end up with our terrain levels image:

       
      3. Creating the actual (64x64) height map
      Now we got our levels image this is fairly simple. Once again, load the map into the converter program. Open the "Convert" menu, go to "Height map generation", and now select "To height map using levels (from map)".

      It will ask you to select the height levels image. Select the final product of our work from the previous step.
      Now the real magic happens. It will generate an image that adapts the terrain to the new heights, and if your cliffs match your levels image correctly, it will make sharp elevations for the cliffs and smooth slopes for the openings where the level decreases on non-cliff terrain. Furthermore, the height of rivers and other water will be applied on each specific level.

      Once this step is done, feel free to save the image if you want to add some more specific tweaks to it, or fix any errors the generator might have made. If you think the map is good enough, though, you can continue straight to the next step.
       
      4. Converting the height map to the final format
      So we got a 64x64 height map image now, loaded into the converter. The N64 game not only needs the image to be 65x65, but also needs it saved in the specific paletteless IMG format.
      First things first: go to "Convert", "Height map generation", and select the final option: "To 65x65 height map image (from image)". As you see, this is the only option in there that doesn't use a C&C map as input but an image.

      Select it, and the 64x64 data will be centered in a 65x65 frame, creating smoother edges everywhere.

      Starting from v1.04, the image in the editor will automatically identify itself as paletteless N64 image, so all you need to do is press Ctrl+S to save it in the correct format.
      ...and that's it! You have your height map, ready to insert into the ROM. The name format the game looks for is exactly the same as for the .ini and the .bin, just with .img as file extension.
    • By Nyerguds
      Over at TiberiumWeb, Lin Kuei Ominae has been doing some very interesting experiments with triggers, and has come up with some neat ways to do stuff like making an AI-owned MCV move to a spot and deploy there, making reinforcements arrive on the Nod airstrip, and making a trigger to give a player money. I suggest you check it out
      http://www.tiberiumweb.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=3743
      Mind my replies though; Lin Kuei did make a couple of mistakes
    • By sgtmyers88
      EDIT: The new mod profile is live!
       
      So long time no chat. lol 😀 Since finally completing the story campaigns for Tiberian Dawn Redux a couple years ago I have been repeatedly approached about carrying the mod over into the RA universe with a spinoff. While it's still in the very early stages of development, Red Alert Redux is slowly being brought to life. I haven't decided if it will be a mini-mod type add-on built into TDR (think GDI/Nod vs. Allies/Soviets in skirmish) or a standalone project built off of the renovated C&C Generals SAGE engine TDR is now using. I know a lot of the assets and coding between the original TD and RA games is nearly the same so it would streamline development quite a bit. (looking into the original game files I noticed a lot of the art and audio assets are using the same filenames to confirm this) The biggest hurdles I have will be making a decent naval system, designing, coding, and animating attack dogs and then the Chronosphere stuff. I may also (as I did with TDR) consolidate the unit and structure tech tree and add unit upgrades and special abilities. (e.g. Engineers doubled as Mechanics and APC's doubled as Medics) So who wants Red Alert Redux? And I will say it will not be a 1:1 remake. As I did with TDR I aim to keep as much of the original wacky tech and atmosphere Westwood developed for TD and RA but also have a more realistic spin on it in both appearance and gameplay. I have been considering consulting with the former Cold War Crisis Mod Team and the guys behind Red Alert: A Path Beyond.
       
       
       



    • By Lemon_sock
      Hello,
      First time using cncnet, I keep getting kicked whenever I join a game in the lobby but don't understand why. Sometimes I get a message saying no connection or problem with connection from one of the players. Or ping will come up with my name as NA. When I join a game in the lobby there's usually no green "I'm ready" button in the bottom left, it's only there if I try host a game (but then when I click it says waiting to connect, please try again in a few seconds or something).
      Can anyone advise, or help troubleshoot? I'm guessing there's a connection issue my end but dont know how to diagnose.
      (I have managed somehow to play two online games, no idea why it worked then but not most of the time).
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...