FunkyFr3sh Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 I don't think this is going to happen, at least no one is working on that ;(
FunkyFr3sh Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 What why? It is not that easy to add support for another game to CnCNet. We don't have anyone here who got the needed love for Emperor to add support for it
DeepForest Posted January 7, 2015 Author Posted January 7, 2015 I understand. Thanks. But Emperor cool game. Is`t it? Or Emperor have bad balance?
Nyerguds Posted January 8, 2015 Posted January 8, 2015 I understand. Thanks. But Emperor cool game. Is`t it? Or Emperor have bad balance? That's kind of beside the point. People here work on games because they're enthusiastic about playing/hacking/researching those games. No one here is particularly enthusiastic about Emperor. That's really all.
LordPickaxe Posted May 31, 2015 Posted May 31, 2015 Hi, I'm terribly enthusiastic about Emperor and would be happy do try and make it live again. The main problem is that this really isn't me area of expertise, do you know where I could start?
FunkyFr3sh Posted June 1, 2015 Posted June 1, 2015 It depends what you are trying to do, something like the older version of CnCNet might be easy to create since you don't need to create a new interface and just abuse the LAN lobby of the game. Adding support to CnCNet5 is much harder and you need to do a lot of game patches
LordPickaxe Posted June 6, 2015 Posted June 6, 2015 Thanks Funky, the first option sounds best - to allow CnCnet to replace the old westwood server network. I'll start doing some research into how this may be done.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now