MapDesigner Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 How are they both different? It seems to me nuke is better vs tanks and anthrax better vs infantry. Am I mistaken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X3M Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 I never liked it that they used anthrax, or the word. Anthrax is deadly, not simply damaging. Soldier received anthrax? It is done for! Radioactivity on the other hand, works slower. In fact, if you had a medium to high dose. There is still a chance for survival. The nuclear explosion beats them all! You can't withstand evaporation, now can you? Either way, the effects of radiation and anthrax are both too slow for RTS games. I rather see napalm or acid to take its place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now