Hungry Mike

Sometimes it seems like Arnolds are weaker again. Some ppl had the same thought. I tested it, it seems to be ok; but idk. So please answer this question honestly: Are Arnolds weaker again or are they still the same as they were before in Vet?

Who are you? RA2 guy, we never even met before. Did you go back to your grandma, getting her approval for your post? lol. Bs talking moron.

Trooper and Tigerr are solid elite players, but Phatmouse currently is just better than them. Hes almost on one level with Nod-Mola. Rami seems to improved a lot, true; hes a good guy, too. But he has to surpass his last test: Winning against me haha

Is there any rule considering op units? No. You just talk BS. And idk what you mean with "useless unit". You are just a crazed RA2 noob, who wants to talk smack. Go back to your inferior game pls; although i like the Kirovs: I guess you will get rekt by them over and over

Easy vote for me: Phatmouse.

Haha Nice game! But my Arnolds wont go that easily, TS is just too fun

You are so ANGRY . Let it out!

Btw, that giants game was ez. You were a bit sleepy tho

Now you even call for closing it down, because you just want to run away from your stupid post. Typical. I am not mad at all, i just find it funny how you play a game like this.

Well sounds fair

You know that MOLA said that, what you quoted, and you insult me for it haha. Well, maybe Mola is just right i guess "Look at the $ count in a noob game?" So you mean by me informing new players what the standard settings are and helping them get acquainted with not having essentially unlimited funds, that's me "doing anything for a win"? Lol." You dont even get, what i am talking about. Remember the game where there were only 2500 $ and you looked for the money count, while I just relaxed and then later see the horrible settings? Memory is a tough thing.

Lol, you dont get a joke. Did you even see my smiley? But it sounds like whoever you are, you are VERY ANGRY

Hahaha, nice try ;). But in democracy, the majority is all you need; although i am not big fan of democracy, either... (wahahaha, see the dark Side of the force). And we have the majority! But as i said earlier: Both ways are ok: Either no vanila maps at all or vet and vanilla maps. If they would allow it, it depends on you Vanila people to act fair. If you all use it just to destroy the competition by going Vanila only, then they will have no choice than to go back and ban these maps from the ladder. So: The poll clearly states: VET WON (MAJORITY)

I NEVER did.

Love your bugs, np. But then dont join my game and disrespect my rules Lol. I dont care, Corps, what you or the rest of the Vanila Clan thinks. If i join your games, your nonsensical rules (lets just keep up any bug there is) apply. Sadly, almost noone joins your games anymore... i wonder why btw: Wasnt it you who even looked at the $ count in a noob game? Haha, you will do anything for a win i guess; how can you relax doing the job, others have to do? Btw: Phatmouse, 5 games are over, you are redeemed from your "sin"

Thats why i prefer the normal way which worked out fine for 2000 years.

I did harv in one game at the end, at that was fair and not a rule breaking. The rest are lies. Do you have anyone who can varify your blattent lies? No. And i dont get why you make these things up. You just let noobs in all the time and refused to make fair teams.

I never did. There was ONLY one game, where you said before "no harvs". You were dead, and only when you were dead, i considered it the right time to troll you with harvs. But it was just friendly trolling, had no impact on the game. Your rule "no harv" means - understood on the basis of common TS law lol - no harv when it has an impact, not, that you cant troll with them, when the game is finished.

Ye, the irony of playing a game with me as host, when i tell you exactly what rules there are in my games. And you redicule it because you depend on disgusting bug usage. Thats why ppl like Mola or NME are just stronger than you. They dont need that kind of stuff.

Crybaby alert.

After i saw blatently disgusting rule breaking yesterday, i want to make it clear to everyone, what he automatically agrees on, when he joins my game (= so only if i host the game) and plays it: - No usage of the sub underground bug. If the sub is clearly underground, you dont shoot at it; if you still do it, you correct the bug by selling either your warfac or mcv. If you resist, game is lost for you, ill ban you for 10 games and redicule you in the lobby. If it happens because of guard mode/rpgs..., you still have to sell the warfac/mcv, if it happens in a cc rush, you can also demand a restart of the game. - The same for: 2-tits-cc-q-bug, if you are stupid enough to demand Vanilla maps. Banned for 10 games. - The same for: Lag usage. Some ppl love to lag, when they are getting attacked or when its a micro battle, but then all of a sudden, the lag stops. It could be just a coincidence, but that doesnt matter. If it happens more than once with you, you correct it by letting your men die. If you refuse, you get banned for the period where you dont fix your con, but atleast 5 games. - Laggy specs who dont leave are banned for 10-20 games. (New NME-Rule for morons, i like it) - The same for: Using cliff bugs. If a unit doesnt shoot because of a cliff, and you didnt use it on purpose, you correct it by letting your unit of equal cost die/the attacked building die. If you refuse to do it, despite being informed about it, or do it voluntarily, you lose the game, get banned for 10 games and rediculed in the lobby for your low iq. - Using harv capture bug with inf = game lost, ban for 3 games or warning. - The same for: Using airplanes flying to enemy base bug: If on some maps bans/bombers still fly through the enemie's base to come after being built and this ruins the strat for one player, game is nullified and map is to be changed. - If you have chosen colors before game to get a certain team without the knowing of the host, you lose the game immediately; if you refuse to aknowledge that, you get banned for 1 game. The sudden change of sides just before the game is allowed. - If you use a fake noob name in order to hide, the game is immediately lost; if you refuse to aknowledge that, you get banned for 1 game. - If you refuse to take spots or teams before the game despite the host demanding it and thus refuse to get fair teams, you get kicked from the lobby. - If you openly play against your teammates (letting them die on purpose for instance) its trojan horse usage. The game is won for the opponents and the one, who got betrayed, which are declared a new team automatically; the opponents of the trojan horse team have to ally with the betrayed ones to eliminate the trojan horse. After the game, the trojan horse is to be banned for atleast 1 game. - If you harv on Giants, when the game isnt lost yet and when the other side didnt commit rule breakings by their own, the game is lost and you get banned for 1 game. - Spec interfer in the form of frequently insulting others to distract them from the game is only allowed at start of the game, after that only, if the person broke rules in the games before against you; insults without that intention or not frequently said are of course allowed as is free speech in general . So you can talk as much as you want, as long as you dont insult for distraction purposes. Spec interfer in the form of activally helping isnt allowed, when theres no noob/unfair team. If you do it, you get a warning; if you refuse to get it, you get banned for 3 games. If it had an impact to the game, the victim of the spec interfer is the winner, if he had adventage and any pro would bet he would win; otherwise, its nullified. - If you lie about rule breakings, you get the same punishment as the one would have gotten, if your claim would be true. - If you lie you never played a map before, to get a bonus, you lose the game and get banned for 2 games. - The host is required to tell you whether FS is on or not. If he forgets it, you can choose to go on or nullify the game and restart. - FFA = No alliances For all punishments: If your refusal is permanent, the ban is permanent. I hope i made myself very clear. I am done with that kind of shitty behaviour. Play fair for f. sake! If you cant do it, just go to the market and buy you character and brain. And here are the ones who got their current punishment for my games: Bez: Sub underground bug usage, after refusal to play maps where this bug is mostly killed (Vet maps), then refusal to correct bug after, bragging about it: Permanent ban from my games, as long as his denial is permanent. Integ: (14.10.2020): Banned for 10 games for 2vs1ing in ffa and using a bug (tanks gets order to shoot 6 times a 1 hp cc, instead shoots a hospital), then refusing to correct it by selling his wf/mcv

The poll is clear: 6 said let it be as it is. I voted for Firestorm as a additional change, but other than that, i am clearly on their side. So 7 for them. 4 said change it to Vanila. I consider Amokk to be on their side, so its 5 for them. 1 is neutral. So the decision is AGAIN clear; after x-times of polling, the Vet Patch still prevails.

Yeah, i get your reasoning, its one of two ways to go with them. The new fire rate is somewhat near to the Obelisk in TD... which i should like. I dont think they are useless btw, especially in 4vs4s on lets say FF. Build 2 of them and you have silence in your far away base and can harass people all you want . The changes are really good and just. The tank bug fix for its own makes TS 2x more playable. Thats exactly the point why the dont want to do it i guess. Because Vanila Pharisees would just only play Vanilla, thus making it an unfair competition to guys like Mola, who play the fair Anti-Bug Vet maps.

Cash is something you can hold in your hands, legally. I dont want to use cards or internet crap for this, just a normal bank transaction or cash.

You heard of the thing CASH? I pray for your brain, if you have one.