Savage gdi players 2v2

[Weaponx]

They are all great gdi players, but who do you think excels currently in 2v2.

 

(the most savage 2v2 player).

Edited July 14, 2020 by Weaponx

[Hungry Mike]

Easy vote for me: Phatmouse.

[Avesta]

I mean, besides corpsmakr, they’re all pretty much solid 10/10s What’s the point in making a poll? You didn’t even ask which one is “most” savage.

Most impressive player in 2020 for me is Rami, he’s most improved by far, always paying attention, makes good decisions, and doesn’t slack off. 
 

Donno who is “currently” active but I’d add trooper to the list I guess?

[Hungry Mike]

1 hour ago, Avesta said:

I mean, besides corpsmakr, they’re all pretty much solid 10/10s What’s the point in making a poll? You didn’t even ask which one is “most” savage.

Most impressive player in 2020 for me is Rami, he’s most improved by far, always paying attention, makes good decisions, and doesn’t slack off. 
 

Donno who is “currently” active but I’d add trooper to the list I guess?

Trooper and Tigerr are solid elite players, but Phatmouse currently is just better than them. Hes almost on one level with Nod-Mola. Rami seems to improved a lot, true; hes a good guy, too. But he has to surpass his last test: Winning against me haha  

[en3rgy52]

All good players (except me). I would say Cambria and Carnage are the most savage in that they are prepared to go for all in builds more than the others listed and can arguably pull them off more regularly.

The other players favour longer game styles and typically use more cookie cutter builds like 4 or 5 ref. That is not to say that Carnage or Cambria can't do this, nor is it the case that the others can't rush or play more aggressively earlier, it is just a case of what they tend to do more often.

 

 

 

[Weaponx]

On 7/14/2020 at 12:31 PM, en3rgy52 said:

All good players (except me). I would say Cambria and Carnage are the most savage in that they are prepared to go for all in builds more than the others listed and can arguably pull them off more regularly.

The other players favour longer game styles and typically use more cookie cutter builds like 4 or 5 ref. That is not to say that Carnage or Cambria can't do this, nor is it the case that the others can't rush or play more aggressively earlier, it is just a case of what they tend to do more often.

 

 

 

Not true your a top 2v2 player. You know team support and when/ how to send help at the correct times. And your attacks if timed correctly with your allies are what win games

1v1 they might have edges on some areas, but your 2v2 is solid.

2v2 is all about team play, some players focus to much on ego and do not communicate or time the attacks / defends correctly.

 

Edited July 14, 2020 by Weaponx

[Avesta]

2v2 is all that matters. 1v1 is meaningless on TS

[Weaponx]

Nice poll variation. 

[Avesta]

I just want to reiterate that 2v2 is all that matters. And it’s absolutely a fact that what I just said is true. 1v1 is nothing more than a competition between who has robotized their patterns better. 2v2 requires superior judgment, awareness, decision making, adaptability, focus, team work, complex strategy and timing, etc

the people who specialize in 1v1 are always problem allies in 2v2 games. They never warn, never adapt, are always predictable and 1 dimensional, never support their allies, etc. Where as strong 2v2 players are reliable and proficient in all of those much more difficult aspects of the game while being able to hold their own or best the 1v1 specialists more often than not. 

I dare you to argue me.

[Weaponx]

I agree with you. 
 

2v2 is where the skills really are. 
 

I’ve seen players who are solid 1v1 but 2v2 they play ego 1v1 style and fail to assist allies and do proper team attacks. 
which often results in loses or draws.

[Hungry Mike]

On 7/25/2020 at 2:57 AM, Avesta said:

I just want to reiterate that 2v2 is all that matters. And it’s absolutely a fact that what I just said is true. 1v1 is nothing more than a competition between who has robotized their patterns better. 2v2 requires superior judgment, awareness, decision making, adaptability, focus, team work, complex strategy and timing, etc

the people who specialize in 1v1 are always problem allies in 2v2 games. They never warn, never adapt, are always predictable and 1 dimensional, never support their allies, etc. Where as strong 2v2 players are reliable and proficient in all of those much more difficult aspects of the game while being able to hold their own or best the 1v1 specialists more often than not. 

I dare you to argue me.

1) 1vs1 matters, 2vs2 matters, 3vs3 matters... I dont think objectivelly one thing matters more than the other; the only thing that really matters is the FUN. And for me, 4vs4s are the most fun thing there is in TS  

2) Not all ppl that are good in 1vs1 are bad in 2vs2 lol. (Mola for example)

[amokk]

1 hour ago, Hungry Mike said:

the only thing that really matters is the FUN

I hope, one day, you can see that others think that as well.........being a ultra competitive player is not enjoyable way to spend my life. having people disregard the rules, not fun, abuse, not fun, jerks, not fun to me.

just playing casually, and enjoying it, fun

 Glad you are having fun as well...

Edited July 28, 2020 by amokk

[Avesta]

6 hours ago, Hungry Mike said:

1) 1vs1 matters, 2vs2 matters, 3vs3 matters... I dont think objectivelly one thing matters more than the other; the only thing that really matters is the FUN. And for me, 4vs4s are the most fun thing there is in TS  

2) Not all ppl that are good in 1vs1 are bad in 2vs2 lol. (Mola for example)

Molas 1v1 ability are due to his 2v2 performance.