Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Now lets see. A Xbox One runs Star Wars Battlefront EA at 1280 x 720 at about 60 FPS, a Playstation 4 runs it at 1600 x 900 at around 60 FPS.

 

My PC runs it at 2560 x 1440 at over 100 FPS. (No AA) Now, a PS4/Xone is a better price to performance option than my ridiculously overkill PC. You can make fairly cheap PC's now a days that can run most games fairly well and PC games are usually cheaper than their console counterparts.

Posted

The GPU in the PS4 is roughly equal to a Radeon HD 7850. A single GTX 980 Ti is about exactly 3 times faster.

 

The Xbox One is even more behind, with the GPU being equal to a HD 7790. The performance is a bit harder to estimate since there's no HD 7790 with DDR3 RAM and fancy cache like in the Xbone, but I'd guess that a single GTX 980 Ti is about 4 times faster.

 

A "mainstream" i7 (like the i7-4790K) is about 2.5 times faster than the CPU in the PS4 and Xbox One, even if all 8 cores are put into use.

 

Now, the latest consoles do have about as much GPU power as the average gaming PC out there, but they're not even close to high-end PC graphics.

Posted

I've read somewhere, I think in a PCGamer article that the console makers are putting pressure on Studios to diminish the FPS from 60 to 30, so they can get rid of a lot of problems.

Posted

Im pretty sure my GPU is stronger than those consoles. Its the Nvidia Geforce 640 GT.

 

Everything else is worse. But im probably planning to upgrade my RAM,change power supplies,get a new card,more cooling and then overclocking my Athlon X4 II.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...