Jump to content

Weaponx

Members
  • Posts

    408
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Weaponx

  1. I liked that me and red had an awesome 1v1 with those settings lol ?
  2. I am confused, how you can play so much, and yet be so bad. Its a mystery, or is it to much modded ?
  3. Your just a clueless noob crying wolf.
  4. I am sorry Amokk, but anything you say just sounds like utter rubbish. First off i have no clue why you even comment, you lack everything in all fields of this game, control, game tactics, unit management, experience and basic knowledge of the game. You insist on playing rubbish modded maps, which wont ever improve your gameplay on regular maps. As for new players coming to ts, who in their right mind would tell them to play giants, which doesn't represent ts at all. Also a player who calls other players for cheaters without proof, just because they lose, and are out-skilled. (You calling momo a cheater). Is just laughable, and you want to come here and give your opinion. It is just as useless as you calling people for cheaters.
  5. Useless topic, no evidence, no video proof, just assuming people who rek you cheat. A) Cheats don't work here, and B) He doesn't cheat....
  6. Not true your a top 2v2 player. You know team support and when/ how to send help at the correct times. And your attacks if timed correctly with your allies are what win games 1v1 they might have edges on some areas, but your 2v2 is solid. 2v2 is all about team play, some players focus to much on ego and do not communicate or time the attacks / defends correctly.
  7. They are all great gdi players, but who do you think excels currently in 2v2. (the most savage 2v2 player).
  8. GG wp by ray, i made to many mistakes with sub There was a 2nd game but i accidently deleted the pov dunno if one of the specs recorded .
  9. Amokk all you do is talk trash and honestly play shit on all maps. Enough said.
  10. It makes no difference for ww players if you have rubish maps like giants on ladder, The people who play them, will still be at bottom and still be rubish players. But they can only reject so many maps and will be forced to play ww maps anyway. It won’t make a difference to the ladder due to the fact they can’t only play one map and therefore most likely won’t play it since they are forced to play maps which requires skills......
  11. You do not need to post vet patch notes, you can post a link where people can go and read. I play vet and none-vet without issues, i just prefer vet since its a fair hot fix which balance the game more. That said, ladder activity have always been low but when vet was introduced, it went high. Look at the past 12 months and before and after vet, it speaks for it self. The ladder is fine as it is, no need to change it.
  12. Your an idiot, no one asked for vet notes. They asked for Patch notes. Some admin remove his post, its useless and annoying to scroll true, and has nothing to do with the question asked on thread.
  13. Amok you posted that useless spawn. Please remove that so people can focus on the tread?
  14. There is a huge unbalanced between gdi and nod, and the vet patches aims and hits correct fixing this. (Original game developer, said they never finished the game and for instance tick armor upgrade is great, since tick was never meant to be as weak as it is) Vet maps also distributes tib pretty even and fair on maps, so one player wont have more benifite econ wise compared to the other. (origianl game developer, said they often just toss around tib, measuring eye wise, and never did think to make it fair, which is a mistake from their side). This new cnc ladder with random selected teams and player you face, is fair, and so is the vet fixes and maps. Anyone who claims otherwise, do not know what they are talking about. I have seen no valid reasons not to like vet fixes and maps. As for winning the pc corpsmakr, you won by 6 points vs me, and i waited 1½ hour for a game and didnt get one. (unlucky on final day) Also you farmed some newb 10x in row for pts, where i actually played different players, i would never play 1 rubish player 3min games just for points. Then again thats the difference between me and you.
  15. I think fire plays fine on WW, his gameplay reflects his giant style. Tiger tends to beat him alot and he is not a modder. Just an example. The issue with giants is the majority is "2nd class players", and therefore fire will excell there. He basically only face them, I cant think of a good modder except fire, but i think fire has decent ww skills, ive played alot of 2v2 with him vs ww players, and his gameplay is not top level but its decent enough to compete and play with WW players. The main problem with giant players / modders is they will never really learn how to play tiberian sun on WW maps, due to the fact they are dependent on fast harvs, cheaper units, modified units, maps etc. Where a WW player knows how to use the units correctly, build without having fast harvs etc. and will therefore have better gameplay then a modder, in general. A modder wont control harvs, watch the econ etc but most likely spawn units. A ww player will control harvs, watch econ, beware of what he builds and spawning units anyone can do. But thats just my personal opinion. Tiger, tropper, me can handle any mod maps and rarely lose on them. (1v1, not taking 4v4 into consideration as teamplay tend to lack in giants games)
  16. Modders have no chance vs WW players, once the ww players figger the maps out. I dont even play mod maps, and have no issues owning other players on mod maps, if i have tried the map just once...... Mod maps shouldnt be in the ranked tournement anyway. It does not reflect the game as it was meant to be played. And yes you can add hotfixes to maps and units to balance it (especially when you got original developers backing you up), like cc accuracy (doesnt miss as often). Thats why VET is viable for tournement ranked games. But you cant adjust units like getting faster harvesters, cyborgs shooting emps, and other rubish. As not for playing vet, with no valid reason and wanting giants in, i see no logic to this.
  17. PM the original team / people of “vet” work, they have the info you seek. Also most likely they are going to use some of the vet fixes in the remaster.
  18. Wrong. They aren’t suppose to be like that, they just never finished fixing the game, confirmed Westwood source. (for the record a vet tick loses vs a Titan undeployed but it’s a close battle, deployed it has 1 bar left).
  19. These minor buffs, changing tick armor (when bombed only), cc accuracy, would have been implementet, and will be in the new ts remaster. I will laugh my ass out when TS remaster comes with new fixes, using code from vet patch. What then?
  20. Keep vet maps. Keep ladder as it is, ts has been overall slow, changing ladder wont change it. Also you saw how active it was all the previous months since the vet patch came. Also everything Avesta said is on point, no need for me to repeat that. ** Note red alert etc remaster have just been launched, taking some players to that.
  21. Weaponx

    Champsite

    destroy3r been on lately.
  22. Some newb mentioned my name and cheating, lmao. Which was your main log anyway, i dont recall sexbomb ? Anyway come online and lets see how well you do
×
×
  • Create New...