Hungry Mike

I fully agree with you WeaponX, that Nod is too weak. - The most annoying thing is q-ing disses. C&C misses them, roket men miss them, undeployed tanks miss them, bikes miss them; only banshees and obelisks target them well. - If you attack with Devils, they get bombed away by 2 bombers; or are easy for rpgs. If you attack with C&C, its better, but still: Easy for bombers, rpgs and tits. Tanks are bomber food and too weak against inf, bikes are so weak, they cant even win against 1 soldier. And if you have banshees (after all the stuff you need for def with the little $/tib you have), GDi will just have engies, sams and 2 or 3 mcvs. So how the hell do you want to attack? Harv harassing doesnt work either, because a stealth tank or a bike cant hold its own against 1 titan. - Why are Cyborgs so lame for WW maps? Make them stronger against vehicles, especially tits, and resistant against bombers. - Obelisks are strong, but you need way too much energy for them. - Why cant bikes shoot at air targets like in TD? - So true what you said about Mammuths: Why does Nod need Temple? - Why do Buggies cost 500 $ instead 300 $ like in TD?

GDI will never be stronger than the Brotherhood, infidel :P. xD. But you are so right! All this crying is such annoying.

I already did that 1 year ago, but noone cared. You dont have to take my word for it, you just had to watch a certain video from a friend of yours (who has it of course now deleted, because it was a too devestating kind of defeat). So to clear it up: What i want to know is, is Chem permanently muted or just for time?

Neither should the rank decide the punishment. Imagine someone calls you gay 6 times in a video and then bans you for winning a game. Not nice!

Play TD more often, bro! We need you ?

Chem is banned again. With his ban, he cant organize his games well and our whole TD community has to suffer for it. My question: How long will he be banned in game and how long will he be banned in forum? Hes a rat, we all know that (:D), but Mash, Byaly and all others bag you to lift his ban. He learned his lesson!

Nice!

We dont need standards of competitive play, White. The best standard is watching you lose (joke). Let them play, what they want. The same for this mod: If they want to make a mod, if they want to play a game with these settings, let them do it. Just dont call it patch, call it mod or alternative settings. I only hope, that people wont use these mods to force others not to use engies or helis. That would be heresy to Kane, the Brotherhood and C&C TD. Maybe tell in your lobby advices that the mod is not there to create a new rift and that the original game is still superior and should be played, when people argueing about playing the mod or the original game.

Apcs are fine as they are. A good player can defend them; its hard to learn, but its a special TD skill. I see no point in slowing them down. If we argue with logic, well, why Chem warriors not die to Tiberium? Why does Nod only have light tanks, when they are the heirs of the Sowjet Union? Apcs are needed to secure poor little engies, who want your base! No changes needed. The only real good change would be to eliminate Viscs from 1vs1 games.

Nonsense. Apcs have to be fast. Otherwise, they are useless.

Not in TD! For sure! XD

As for now, the most unliked point of the patch are the anti-engi settings. Isnt it nice, that more and more people care for the human rights of poor little engineers, who are so sweet and innocent? Free the engineers!

I wonder who voted against anti engi changes...

XD. Well, maybe rule braking is fun for some people

Yeah. Hes just an rule braking a**! Nice to hear that. Was he ANGRY, after you trolled him? Hahaha

What Black said, is so true. But why does this challenge have to be about money? You can take my money, but there is one thing a saiyan always keeps... his prooooooooooud xD (WW maps suck btw :P)

No, ffa doesnt mean they are free to decide what they do. Are they free to use cheats? Are they free to use bugs? Are they free to outlag the game on purpose? Are they free to team up, despite playing a non-teamgame? Please explain me then, why ffa doesnt mean diplomacy game. The answer is no. FFA doesnt mean no rules, it means no teamgame. If you play teamgame, you therefore brake the rules and LOSE the game. Its simple. But maybe you need legal knowledge to get that. 99 % havent got that kind of knowledge, so that explains the painfully wrong remarks here. Its sadening tho to see that even you guys feel free to team up against others on FFA. Maybe they should teach people basic law in school these days, so they can atleast use basic logic on things like that.

False, FFA isnt a teamgame, because you would call it teamgame then. FFa isnt a diplomacy game either. FFA means all vs all, not all vs X. But some guys dont have legal knowledge, so i get that. Not anyone sees the things as clear as i do

False. If its a team game, you would call it a team game. FFA therefore doesnt mean no rules, it means you play all vs all, you of course can focus on certain players to win, if there now the strongest, but you cant just simply team up with others to single out players, that would be a teamgame.

I want to inform anyone of a player called Nike. He brakes rule consistenly by 2vs1ing players in ffa. Ffa doesnt mean team game. He doesnt get that. Any decent host will ban him for life.

Apc + Engies

Engineers are not situational units . As well as light tanks. SSM is important on ffa maps or in later team game. Chem warriors are underestimated, but i wouldnt rank them higher than the others. In terms of use frequency, flame tanks get used only by Pence (some sources say, thats me ), but they are really strong.

Well, then i wouldnt play with 95 % of the TD community, because they all 2vs1, 3vs1 me in ffa games (which is rule braking: ffa means NO alliances; and an alliance is to team up and work together, not to formally ally necessarily), capture bases of players, who left, dont tell about 2nd mcvs, use bugs, even lag on purpose, and so on. Its just horrible. I dont do that, i am a man of principle. You dont have that in the TS community. Yesterday, a guy called me names, because i pointed his cheating (2vs1 in ffa) out. If its FFA, it doesnt mean no rules: Its not a diplomacy game and its certainly not a team game. But they will sell their mother to win a game, because they have some serious issues, for which they have to compensate. They need the feeling of power, because they feel powerless; so sad. There are some good guys in the TD community, like Hashton, Hk10, Claudio or "Justme". But the rest is mostly a bunch of crybabies and cheaters, who cry, when you win fairly, and cry, when you win by rule braking.

You are not allowed to win a TD game. You are not allowed to be good in TD. They will do anything to get you, brake any rule there is. 2vs1, 3vs1 even 4vs1, dont tell you about a 2nd mcv, use shit maps, which gives them a bonus, and so on. Just a toxic, hypocritical community after all. Guys like Chem will cry, when you outplay them fairly, but even 3vs1 you in rage and dont tell you about 2nd mcvs. Its just not fun to play TD with these guys. They brake any rule and think they win the game, when in fact, they lose because of rule braking. But it shows only how weak they are. Ts is much fairer and nicer!

xD. Hahaha . Yeah, Ts players love to shit talk. RA2 the whiniest? I only see the Kike videos, so i cant tell lol. Td players are only a few, but they often talk much after a game in the lobby. Btw: Noone talks about the Dune "community" XD. Is there any Dune community alive?