Jump to content

CnCNet Forums

Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
  • 2
Sign in to follow this  
Grant

Q4 - Do you want structure and unit categories in a Sidebar?

Q4 - Do you want structure and unit categories in a Sidebar?  

48 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Do you want structure and unit categories in a Sidebar like RA2, C&C3 and RA3 or do you prefer having one list with structures and one list with units like C&C1, RA1 and TS?

    • Yes - I would like to see structure & unit categories
      21
    • Maybe - As an option to toggle back
      22
    • No (Explain in your reply)
      5


Question

CnCNet Question:

Quote

In a C&C or a Red Alert Remaster, would you want structure and unit categories on the sidebar like RA2, C&C3 and RA3 or do you prefer having 1 list with structures and 1 list with units like C&C1, RA1 and TS

RA-Sidebar-Categories.png

  • How to up-vote or down-vote on replies - Read here
  • Questions will automatically close after 2 weeks.
  • Questions are about Tiberian Dawn and Red Alert since the latest announcement - Read here
  • Note: Unless question topics are tagged by an EA tag, this question is not from EA and is from CnCNet.

 

Let your voice be heard!
Join in on the discussion on Twitter!

Or alternatively on Facebook!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 3

I prefer like in C&C1,RA, and TS. Everything is in one place so I can just scroll with the mouse-wheel if I wanna buy anything. Having additional categories takes some time to get used to and needs to assign more hotkeys (to change between tabs) if you wanna buy things fast. I want this especially in TD where there's not many stuffs and the sidebar shows lots of purchasable options on high resolution so I don't have to press an extra hotkey or click a tab just to buy something if it's a different category of my last purchase.

I played a lot of Red Alert and Tiberian Dawn but a few weeks ago I played RA3 and C&C3 again and I find the different categories in the sidebar more complicated. Especially in RA3 since there's additional tabs for boats and planes (at least RA2 only has 4, where all vehicles share the same category).

Tldr: I prefer the sidebar like the original, everything is in one place and can be easily scrolled with the mouse wheel.

Edited by ore_truck
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2

No. Too cumbersome for TD/RA, in my opinion. Just let people change the order construction options appear in at will. I already said something to that effect in a reply to one of the previous questions. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

I voted maybe. Make it optional.

I got reasons that would support the yes AND the no vote. I bet all of them are going to be mentioned in this topic in the next week.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

 

Can my vote be undone I picked the wrong one?

 

Judging by what cn2mc says it is an inferior way to do it because there's so few units and structures in TD, if there were alot of units/structures it would be the better design.

Also will it make the game slower and require more hotkeys?

Hot keys are a chore to learn not an enjoyable part of rts imo, im all for minimising hotkeys where ever possible, why add MORE buttons to learn especially if they are unnecessary? It just makes it harder to control when you are in a high adrenaline game.

 

Also I think votes on this are going to be very faulty any normal rational person is going to choose what looks like a neater clearer better layout ie the ra2 layout  but many of them will lack the knowledge someone like cn2mc has , and if they had that knowledge they'd vote the opposite way.

 

 

Edited by chem
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I say make it optional because if the remasters had mods in the future that added more units I could see it useful

Though Retaliation's sidebar was optimized for controllers I did like how they worked the categorized sidebar where the latest unit/building you selected stays selected allowing you to quickly build the same unit you press O or Square on it to select a new one. Of course this feature wouldn't be needed if the units were given shortcut keys.

Spoiler

maxresdefault.thumb.jpg.03b1d4b590edb733b27cace070d76122.jpg

 

Edited by Chad1233
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yes.

Let it be able to be toggled on or off so it gives the user options. It comes down to a preference thing, so having it be an option means everyone's happy in that regard. Best of both worlds in that case.

posted image

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Enough of the words! Give me my sword!

Why is that a Question? You KNOW the people are devided, or get devided: Where is the problem to just make both?

Maybe we get a minority with taking the old style, the other is worse, but not worse (and probably more popular) than the old. the old is better because you see all units and buildings on one glance what I wish, but let the people

1. Get the power to decide the matters of interface

2. Room to adjust that! (1. ingame options for both; and 2. [I only suggest] without impact on the gameplay: Just let them define the interface on code by editing a xml file or such.)

The time is passing on on computer games. Controls is very individual. If you devide it, you devide customers, no matter what you do.
We are COMMANDERS! WE want to control that! I did see in... oh what was that game... Guild wars I think, there you could customize your interface, where you had what. Its not that terrible. Its terrible, if you cannot make queues, where you want some, or 'caged' stances, that you cannot change.

Other modes are better without queues, then let them make manually.

If you are not open for further into the question, to more than just answer, you can ignore the question.

Edited by Kampfkekskrieger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I feel like RA2/C&C3/RA3 makes sense and would add a layer of complexity to skills, you have to switch tabs. Problem is, TD/RA1 doesn't split build queues for defenses and production structures, so I'm sure if it'd do anything. It would, however, remove confusion and having to scroll up and down to find the Barracks units. Consolidating them makes more sense and the time used to find the unit can be better spent, some of it still being lost due to having to switch between tabs, so it's not like it'll make it that much easier and remove skill (IMO).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By mohsen9010
      This is a solution to become a CnCNet host server in linux servers that have systemd for service control (Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS...):
      Do it as a root or add 'sudo' before every command:
       
      useradd -m cncnet wget -c https://downloads.cncnet.org/cncnet-server-core.tgz -O - | tar xz -C /home/cncnet chown cncnet:cncnet /home/cncnet/cncnet-server-core wget -O /etc/systemd/system/cncnet.service https://files.catbox.moe/dz1q2i.service # Change 'my new name server' to your own server name sed -i 's/My cool server/my new name server/g' /etc/systemd/system/cncnet.service systemctl daemon-reload systemctl enable cncnet.service systemctl start cncnet.service Make a service is better than crontab for auto start solution!
      This topic is related to https://forums.cncnet.org/topic/6325-how-to-host-a-cncnet-server/
       
      cncnet.txt
    • By Jacob Foerster
      Need help decoding this crash file. I had to create a duplicate so I could change the file type because cncnet site said that the dmp file types aren't supported so I can't post them. Well at least that they can't be uploaded anymore apparently. Change the file extension back to .dmp so you can help me crack the code of this file.
      ra95crash-0x0050546d - Copy.rar
    • By Sadukar09
      Took a while, but I finally finished a full conversion mod for the original Red Alert. 
      Able Archer is to portray how Red Alert would have played out in the 1980s. I tried to make it as realistic as possible with the limited engine.
      Original campaign works, as do most of the extra missions. Ant missions are strange, as ant units are used for regular buildable units.
       
      C&C Red Alert Able Archer is confirmed to work with C&C The First Decade with TFD 1.03 rev4. 
      Red Alert's version should be 3.03. It may work with other versions of the game, but may encounter bugs.
      -Simply unzip the archive into your Red Alert folder. Make sure to backup existing EXPAND2.mix, hires1.mix, rules.ini, and aftrmath.ini.
       
      PATCH 1.1 has been released, please scroll down.
       
      Known bugs:
      Game crashes when loading more than one game. Simply restart the game and you can load another save.
      Transport Helicopters will attempt to leave the map when Spetsnaz board them. This is hard coded.
      Graphics Credits: AchromicWhite, ROB, Tschokky, Westwood Studios.
      If I forgot to credit you, please let me know so I can add you here.
       


       
      Screenshots



       

      @AchromicWhite @Ferret
       
       
      Red Alert - Able Archer.rar
      Red Alert - Able Archer Patch 1.1.rar
       
    • By Bart
      robskate refusing to wash a game I asked him to. notice no action was taken. the subject was changed (deflection) then he signed off. (ran away) funky here ya go bud. heres your fair ladder admin on full display. if it were his game the issue would be resolved immediately.
      (28) [06:00 PM] <bart_> i gotta ladder game you need to wash and delete
      (28) [06:00 PM] <bart_> you are good at that right?
      (28) [06:00 PM] <robskate___> link me and ill check it out
      (28) [06:01 PM] <bart_> https://ladder.cncnet.org/ladder/3-2020/ra/games/129492
      (28) [06:01 PM] <bart_> thanks in advance
      (28) [07:02 PM] <bart_> thanks for taking care of that for me
      (28) [07:02 PM] * robskate___ is away (In game with: cousinb09_ UFF[Gtr] [Sant1-TA] [TB]-KiCkN `B[e]a5ty NastyDoLChE [TB]-H3zB_) [P4 *Mini* Tourney Edition.]
      (28) [07:02 PM] <bart_> i appreciate it
      (28) [07:02 PM] * robskate___ is away (In game with: cousinb09_ UFF[Gtr] [Sant1-TA] [TB]-KiCkN `B[e]a5ty NastyDoLChE [TB]-H3zB_) [P4 *Mini* Tourney Edition.]
      (28) [07:02 PM] <bart_> god knows if it was your game it would of been resolved within 30 seconds
      (28) [07:02 PM] * robskate___ is away (In game with: cousinb09_ UFF[Gtr] [Sant1-TA] [TB]-KiCkN `B[e]a5ty NastyDoLChE [TB]-H3zB_) [P4 *Mini* Tourney Edition.]
      (28) [07:05 PM] <robskate___> yah just need to bring it up to me
      (28) [07:05 PM] <robskate___> we dont want points for games when other person is clearly winning then a DC
      (28) [07:05 PM] <robskate___> or games with 0 time
      (28) [07:06 PM] <robskate___> but u guys both want win for long game 4c remember you and yuz
      (28) [07:06 PM] <robskate___> both want wash or win or whatever
      (28) [07:06 PM] <robskate___> thats too close to call based on the game stars
      (28) [07:06 PM] <robskate___> stats
      (28) [07:06 PM] <bart_> i didnt mention anything about that
      (28) [07:06 PM] <bart_> so no point to bring it up
      (28) [07:06 PM] <robskate___> seems like something that was affecting your mind for like a week remember?
      (28) [07:06 PM] <robskate___> so np bring it up to me
      (28) [07:06 PM] <robskate___> if i can do soemthing i will
      (28) [07:06 PM] <bart_> no i dont actually
      (28) [07:06 PM] <robskate___> hehe you and yuz both
      (28) [07:07 PM] <robskate___> bringing it up for 1 week
      (28) [07:07 PM] <robskate___> dont catch amnesia now
      (28) [07:07 PM] <bart_> irrelevant subject
      (28) [07:07 PM] <robskate___> its precisely what were talking about right this moment
      (28) [07:07 PM] <robskate___> washing ladder
      (28) [07:07 PM] <bart_> take care of the game i sent you a link to
      (28) [07:08 PM] <bart_> do your job
      (28) [07:08 PM] * Error: robskate___ is not online!
    • By jj235
      Hi, 
      Trying to join multiplayer game of Red Alert. Lobby window opens, but I am stuck with connecting.
       * Connecting... (takes up to 1minute)
      No matter how long I wait, nothing happens. And I get no hint why connection is not successful. I have gone though windows firewall settings, and even disabled firewall completely. Still no luck. App can download game files normally, and I can also play skirmish with no issues.
      How to get connected to lobby? Or where to look next?
      Platform: Win 10 running on vmware fusion on top of OSX.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...