Jump to content

CnCNet Forums

Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
  • 1
Sign in to follow this  
Grant

Q4 - Do you want structure and unit categories in a Sidebar?

Q4 - Do you want structure and unit categories in a Sidebar?  

48 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Do you want structure and unit categories in a Sidebar like RA2, C&C3 and RA3 or do you prefer having one list with structures and one list with units like C&C1, RA1 and TS?

    • Yes - I would like to see structure & unit categories
      21
    • Maybe - As an option to toggle back
      22
    • No (Explain in your reply)
      5


Question

CnCNet Question:

Quote

In a C&C or a Red Alert Remaster, would you want structure and unit categories on the sidebar like RA2, C&C3 and RA3 or do you prefer having 1 list with structures and 1 list with units like C&C1, RA1 and TS

RA-Sidebar-Categories.png

  • How to up-vote or down-vote on replies - Read here
  • Questions will automatically close after 2 weeks.
  • Questions are about Tiberian Dawn and Red Alert since the latest announcement - Read here
  • Note: Unless question topics are tagged by an EA tag, this question is not from EA and is from CnCNet.

 

Let your voice be heard!
Join in on the discussion on Twitter!

Or alternatively on Facebook!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 3

I prefer like in C&C1,RA, and TS. Everything is in one place so I can just scroll with the mouse-wheel if I wanna buy anything. Having additional categories takes some time to get used to and needs to assign more hotkeys (to change between tabs) if you wanna buy things fast. I want this especially in TD where there's not many stuffs and the sidebar shows lots of purchasable options on high resolution so I don't have to press an extra hotkey or click a tab just to buy something if it's a different category of my last purchase.

I played a lot of Red Alert and Tiberian Dawn but a few weeks ago I played RA3 and C&C3 again and I find the different categories in the sidebar more complicated. Especially in RA3 since there's additional tabs for boats and planes (at least RA2 only has 4, where all vehicles share the same category).

Tldr: I prefer the sidebar like the original, everything is in one place and can be easily scrolled with the mouse wheel.

Edited by ore_truck
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2

No. Too cumbersome for TD/RA, in my opinion. Just let people change the order construction options appear in at will. I already said something to that effect in a reply to one of the previous questions. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

I voted maybe. Make it optional.

I got reasons that would support the yes AND the no vote. I bet all of them are going to be mentioned in this topic in the next week.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

 

Can my vote be undone I picked the wrong one?

 

Judging by what cn2mc says it is an inferior way to do it because there's so few units and structures in TD, if there were alot of units/structures it would be the better design.

Also will it make the game slower and require more hotkeys?

Hot keys are a chore to learn not an enjoyable part of rts imo, im all for minimising hotkeys where ever possible, why add MORE buttons to learn especially if they are unnecessary? It just makes it harder to control when you are in a high adrenaline game.

 

Also I think votes on this are going to be very faulty any normal rational person is going to choose what looks like a neater clearer better layout ie the ra2 layout  but many of them will lack the knowledge someone like cn2mc has , and if they had that knowledge they'd vote the opposite way.

 

 

Edited by chem
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I say make it optional because if the remasters had mods in the future that added more units I could see it useful

Though Retaliation's sidebar was optimized for controllers I did like how they worked the categorized sidebar where the latest unit/building you selected stays selected allowing you to quickly build the same unit you press O or Square on it to select a new one. Of course this feature wouldn't be needed if the units were given shortcut keys.

Spoiler

maxresdefault.thumb.jpg.03b1d4b590edb733b27cace070d76122.jpg

 

Edited by Chad1233
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yes.

Let it be able to be toggled on or off so it gives the user options. It comes down to a preference thing, so having it be an option means everyone's happy in that regard. Best of both worlds in that case.

posted image

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Enough of the words! Give me my sword!

Why is that a Question? You KNOW the people are devided, or get devided: Where is the problem to just make both?

Maybe we get a minority with taking the old style, the other is worse, but not worse (and probably more popular) than the old. the old is better because you see all units and buildings on one glance what I wish, but let the people

1. Get the power to decide the matters of interface

2. Room to adjust that! (1. ingame options for both; and 2. [I only suggest] without impact on the gameplay: Just let them define the interface on code by editing a xml file or such.)

The time is passing on on computer games. Controls is very individual. If you devide it, you devide customers, no matter what you do.
We are COMMANDERS! WE want to control that! I did see in... oh what was that game... Guild wars I think, there you could customize your interface, where you had what. Its not that terrible. Its terrible, if you cannot make queues, where you want some, or 'caged' stances, that you cannot change.

Other modes are better without queues, then let them make manually.

If you are not open for further into the question, to more than just answer, you can ignore the question.

Edited by Kampfkekskrieger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I feel like RA2/C&C3/RA3 makes sense and would add a layer of complexity to skills, you have to switch tabs. Problem is, TD/RA1 doesn't split build queues for defenses and production structures, so I'm sure if it'd do anything. It would, however, remove confusion and having to scroll up and down to find the Barracks units. Consolidating them makes more sense and the time used to find the unit can be better spent, some of it still being lost due to having to switch between tabs, so it's not like it'll make it that much easier and remove skill (IMO).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Grant
      Latest announcement from @EA_Jimtern - read the full announcement on the C&C Sub Reddit. 
    • By FunkyFr3sh
      Updates
      Tiberian Sun Single-Player Campaign is now available on macOS and every Linux download.
      Red Alert Single-Player Campaign / Multiplayer downloads were merged together with Tiberian Sun into one download. 
      Downloads are now also available for Pacman-based Linux distributions (Antergos, Manjaro Linux, ...).
       
       
      Downloads
      Ubuntu, Linux Mint, ...                                  cncnet_1.0_all.deb
      Fedora, openSUSE, ...                                  cncnet-1.0-2.noarch.rpm
      Manjaro, Antergos, ...                                  cncnet-1.0-1-any.pkg.tar.xz
      macOS                                                           CnCNet.dmg
       
       
      Find all downloads here                            https://cncnet.org/download
       
       
      You may also be interested in the following snaps made by user [email protected] 
      Red Alert (Full Game)                               https://snapcraft.io/cncra
      Tiberian Sun (Full Game)                         https://snapcraft.io/cnctsun
       
       
    • By D2k18
      In the folder it's named ra95-spawn but it always says: Unable to read scenario
      How do I get it running plz halp!!!11
    • By D2k18
      It always says something about VortexServers, Burstfire, Gameservers.NJ.US.GameSurge.net:8080) and Prothid.NY.US.GameSurge.net (G-lined)...
      What shall I do??
      Plz halp !!!11
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×