Ezer_2000

You understand rule wrong. It is not about promoting. The creation any religion-related speech or statement is breaking the rules. Both sides look like rule breakers here. But the guy who created the room seems was the first and provoked @kenshiro27 to create this topic. Hence, @kenshiro27 is a victim. Your lack of simple logic and defending the causer even points me to a guess you was the causer (that is only the guess, nothing more). Any staff help based on religion feeling can't be done because it is breaking the rules. Staff may solve this problem by having a talk with this guy who initiated this conflict and maybe applying some restrictions to him. To @kenshiro27 I suggest everyone to ignore people like that, because he finds funny everything happened after your reaction.

/CnCNet/Maps/Custom/mapname.map Read .txt file in /Custom/ for more info.

Hello. Definetely, in the CnCNet client the original "Brutal Enemy" is called as "Hard AI". The "Brutal AI" client option is a custom modification supposed to make original AI more difficult. However it didn't ever work for me properly always ended in game crush.

You can make a kind of poll in the game clint: make an option for every cahnge in your mod. Or for groups of them. Host will pick necessary options. Also you can make it possiible for other players vote for options in lobby. Most votes define enabled options.

Here is a trap. This is a mod, not the original game. "Community Balance Patch Mod" would be more precise.

You have to replace file aswell, not just rename it.

I don't know him, but RIP there. http://forums.cncnet.org/topic/8596-jasonzigzag/

Seems those ZhanWangs are really know what to do. ZhanWang: @CnCNet rect CnCnet: Well. We'll look into it.

Please be patient to him, he is only 13.

http://mapdb.cncnet.org/search.php?game=yr&age=0&search=Lost temple Pinned already: https://forums.cncnet.org/topic/7218-map-database-over-30000-maps/

Feels like need a bit more detailisation. Actually this map looks unfinished. I'd suggest to make non-flat ramps on the left, at least one of them. Left side also looks like have advantage with these wider passes between players, compared to right side. Make ramps on the right side at least 2 cells wider. As DoDger mentioned, right side now has too narrow paths for players helping each other (red arrows). Bottom player (left side team) can easily camp on the hill, while the top one (right side team) can't. I think you must add a ramp on the top hill (pink). Also with these changes necessary to move top border to 2-3 cells more top. To give more freedom to the top player to make him able to camp on the cliff in the same way as the bottom one and make access to his base more convinient for his teammates. (Yellow). The right border also might be necessary to move on 2-3 cells, not sure about it. With these changes map would have a real chance to be added to official CnCNet maps I guess. Please do this map more perfect, we all want to play it.

Be careful guys! Here you are discussing the ideas of thousands useless mods have been started.

Just say the main idea: your points depends of your activity and wins.

F**king awesome!!!

There are few, for example in "Head for the hills" map you can build bunkers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq4Xw4x3F9Y Don't know why this vido got so many dislikes

This problem might appear on Win 7 by wrong DPI screen setting. Try set your screen scale to 100%. How to do: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff629368.aspx

Hey guys, good idea, good to see someone have the same thoughts. Here are problems, look: 1) They still can't fix the bugs were found 1 and even 2 years ago, and maybe even earlier. 2) 2 or 3 years ago they had "to do" list on github, and topic related to all of the YR Client problems, now they don't have. 3) They are too busy. 4) This topic will be forgotten in 1-2 months as many others. (no time to search for examples now) Hovewer, they have some thoughts about sorting. My thougts on sorting: Make 2 dropdown menus: 1. Official + CnCNet approved maps / Custom maps 2. Game modes [most game modes doesn't work properly, seems they were made by someone who never played ra2/yr] Menu 2 have all standard game modes for standard maps. Custom maps seems don't have any systematic at all. Generally all custom maps are quite randomly tagged. Whitelisted custom maps need editing of available game modes. + to standard game modes would be nice to see "survival" "mission" and "campagin" modes. For myself I made my personal map standards directed to maintaining of comparability maps CnCNet and vanilla game, reduction of frequently made mistakes even by experienced mapmakers, copyrights, modding and lots other things like description of game modes, preview pic standards. All maps i made and re-made are based on these standards. Sorting maps by author doesn't seem good for me. Here isn't anything special in this except author's nickname. And almost half of maps were made without any signature. First thing need to do, to remove duplicaded maps in maps DB, i saw some exactly same files there. Anyway this is a huge work.

This one who killed him must live forever and suffer all his life long. I played sometimes with him, but i know him since 2010 as a very kind and responsive guy, worthy of nice reverence. I had a great time playing with him. I'm not going to say much due to small experience in this kind of expressions. My apologies if something wrong. Few days ago I was thinking to go online and to see some old friends, and ZiGZaG too. Long ago I told him I'll visit him someday... Rest in peace Jonny!

korc is best.

Virus sniper could be very helpful in begining of this game. That was lucky your opponent was noob.

Done. To be honest, there are more disabled stuff than just air units. Download from CnCnet map DB

@DOGMEATJR3 Hello. Please, don't understand me wrong. But for good mapmaking skills supposed in @FReQuEnZy's post required. We can't teach you that. Sorry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7Fy9FN81Go

All these problems came from unability Microsoft to create software with compatibility principle - bunch of noobs. Every new OS has problems with software were made for previous OS. You can solve this problem by going to the Microsoft and kicking each progremmer ass and sayng: "You are to do this shit working properly with RA2 and any old stuff, noob". And don't forget to slam their faces into their desks if they try to say something about their marketing departament doesn't allow them to do that.

I'd like it to be optional.